United States v. T.M.’s Empirical Analysis
413 F.3d 420 · 2005
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently August 2021
5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Robinson · United States v. Jarrett · United States v. Juvenile Male #1 · United States v. Hill · Impounded
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A juvenile alleged to have committed an act of juvenile delinquency shall not be proceeded against in any court of the United States unless the Attorney General, after investigation, certifies to an appropriate district court of the United States that the juvenile court or other appropriate court of a state (1) does not have jurisdiction or refuses to assume jurisdiction over said juvenile with respect to such alleged act of juvenile delinquency, or (2) does not have available programs and services adequate for the needs of juveniles. If the attorney general does not so certify, such juvenile shall be surrendered to the appropriate legal authorities of such state.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. United States v. IMM“Proper certification under § 5032 by the government is necessary to create subject matter jurisdiction over a juvenile proceeding”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“reviewing the stated reasons underlying the government’s decision to proceed in federal court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.