Schweitzer v. Teamsters Local 100’s Empirical Analysis
413 F.3d 533 · 2005
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Dister v. Continental Group, Inc. · Smith v. Ameritech · Jacklyn v. Schering-Plough Healthcare Products Sales Corp. · Johnson v. Kroger Co. · Conkwright v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“evidence which, if believed, requires the conclusion that unlawful discrimination was at least a motivating factor in the employer’s actions.” See Talley, 61 F.3d at 1248 ; Hazle v. Ford Motor Co., 464 Mich. at 462 , 628 N.W.2d at 520 (quoting Jacklyn v. Schering-Plough Healthcare Products Sales Corp., 176 F.3d 921, 926 (6th Cir.1999)). Put another way,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.