United States v. Thurmon’s Empirical Analysis
413 F.3d 752 · 2005
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3006A (Criminal Justice Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on United States v. Booker · United States v. Olano · Blakely v. Washington · Johnson v. United States · United States v. Pirani
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“after appropriate inquiry in an ex parte proceeding, that the services are necessary and that the person is financially unable to obtain them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“reasonable probability that the requested expert would aid in his defense and that denial of funding would result in an unfair trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.