Mujahid v. Daniels’s Empirical Analysis
413 F.3d 991 · 2005
Citation profile
29 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably Burkey v. Marberry (2009), Arrington v. Daniels (2008)
29 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Spencer v. Kemna · Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. · Leocal v. Ashcroft · Babbitt v. Sweet Home Chapter, Communities for Great Ore.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“his pleading after that transfer. See Mujahid v. Daniels, 413 F.3d 991, 994 (9th Cir. 2005) (‘‘[Jjurisdiction attaches on the initial filing for habeas corpus relief, and it is not destroyed by a transfer of the petitioner and the accompanying custodial change.” (quoting Francis v. Rison, 894 F.2d 353, 354 (9th Cir. 1990))); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2242 ; Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(c)(1)(B); Padilla, 542 U.S. at 441 , 124 S.Ct. 2711 (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“(a) For inmates serving a sentence for offenses committed on or after November 1, 1987, but before September 13, 1994, the Bureau will award 54 days credit toward service of sentence (good conduct time credit) for each year served. This amount is prorated when the time served by the inmate for the sentence during the year is less than a full year.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Tablada v. Thomas“is tenuous at best and requires us to fill in more blanks than we are willing to do”). 6 . Perez argues we should not rule on timeliness because the government did not raise it until supplemental briefing. We have given both parties”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.