Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 413 FSUPP 1113 - Greenfield v. Robinson

Greenfield v. Robinson’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
8
states following
April 2009
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently April 2009

10 state decisions

1101976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Chimel v. California · Davis v. Alaska · Gault · Fay v. Noia · Chambers v. Mississippi

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This court knows of no rule that requires a judge to accept evidence of uncertain value to go to a defense that is otherwise completely uncorroborated. The mere fact that a crime has no eyewitnesses or direct evidence does not warrant a court to accept evidence that may be able to tell the trier of fact something about the crime, but may be of dubious quality. As a constitutional principle then this court simply finds that petitioner’s due process guarantees were not abrogated by the trial court’s refusal to permit the defendant to relate his story under hypnosis. Greenfield at 1120-21 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the very reason for excluding hypnotic evidence is due to its potential unreliability.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.