Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 413 FSUPP 189 - Taylor v. Perini

Taylor v. Perini’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
May 2005
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2005

6 federal appellate · 3 district ·

1101976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Roth v. United States · Miller v. California · Johnson v. Avery · Jacobellis v. Ohio · Book Named 'John Cleland's Memoirs of Woman of Pleasure' v. Attorney General of Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There must be defined procedures for making job assignments, transfers and removals according to the specified substantive criteria, which procedures: 1) Shall provide for centralized responsibility for making such assignments; 2) Shall not allow for deference to the wishes of job supervisors or fellow inmates; 3) Shall not be dependent upon the self-initiative of inmates.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Job assignment, transfer and removal shall not be employed for punitive purposes, and shall not be related to discipline for rule infractions except insofar as such infractions are job related and manifest inability on the part of the violator to function in the job in question. 14”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “There is no effective grievance procedure maintained to process complaints relating to racial discrimination, harassment, intimidation, or insult. Taylor v. Perini, 413 F.Supp. 189, 267 (N.D.Ohio 1976).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.