413 F. Supp. 2d 657 - Bell v. True’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 4241 · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Williams v. Taylor · United States v. Bagley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“facts that, if true, would entitle him to relief,” and it appears from the record that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“is the nation of the arrested foreign national, and the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Teleguz v. Kelly
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.