Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 413 Md. 384 - Usiak v. State

Usiak v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
December 2013
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Roll and Scholl · Buffington v. Baltimore County · Ward v. State · Cromer v. Kraft Foods North America, Inc. · Kandel v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Rule 8-132. Transfer of appeal improperly taken. “If the Court of Appeals or the Court of Special Appeals determines that an appellant has improperly noted an appeal to it but may be entitled to appeal to another court exercising appellate jurisdiction, the Court shall not dismiss the appeal but shall instead transfer the action to the court apparently having jurisdiction, upon the payment of costs provided in the order transferring the action.” See, e.g., Usiak v. State, 413 Md. 384 , 394 n. 9, 993 A.2d 39 , 44 n. 9 (2010); Bienkowski v. Brooks, 386 Md. 516, 550-552 , 873 A.2d 1122, 1142-1143 (2005).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Direct contempt if no summary imposition of sanctions. In any proceeding involving a direct contempt for which the court determines not to impose sanctions summarily, the judge, reasonably promptly after the conduct, shall issue a written order specifying the evidentiary facts within the personal knowledge of the judge as to the conduct constituting the contempt and the identity of the contemnor. Thereafter, the proceeding shall be conducted pursuant to Rule 15-205....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.