Young v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 1990
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Simpson · Apple Oakes v. Greenfield Banking Co. · 113 Ind. App. 589 - Starkie v. State · 177 Ind. App. 355 - Baldock v. State · Stuck v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"[I}t is settled, of course, that the courts, trial and appellate, take notice of their own respective records in the present litigation, both as to matters occurring in the immediate trial, and in previous trials or hearings," McCormick, Evidence, 2d Ed. § 830 at 766 (1972). (emphasis added.) . the court will take judicial notice of earlier determinations involving the same parties which are vital to the determination of the present action,. ..." (Citation omitted.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hicks“A trial court has no authority to order the previously suspended sentences to run consecutive to any other sentence. [Citations omitted.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Pawloski v. State“earlier determinations involving the same parties which are vital to the determination of the present action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hicks
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.