State v. Kraft’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably State v. Olander (1998), State v. Noorlun (2005)
26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on New Yorker Magazine, Inc. v. Gerosa · California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Guerra · National Theatres Corp. v. Bertha Building Corp. · Tatum v. United States · Dranow v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The power to notice obvious error is exercised cautiously and only in exceptional circumstances where the defendant has suffered a serious injustice. In assessing the possibility of error concerning substantial rights under Rule 52(b), it is necessary to examine the entire record and the probable effect of the actions alleged to be error in light of all the evidence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Mathre · State v. Johnson““3. 'Deprive’ means: “a. To withhold property or to cause it to be withheld either permanently or under such circumstances that a major portion of its economic value, or its use and benefit, has, in fact, been appropriated; or * * * * * * “c. To dispose of property or use it or transfer any interest in it under circumstances that make its restoration, in fact, unlikely. ****** “6. ‘Obtain’ means: “a. In relation to property, to bring about a transfer or purported transfer of an interest in the property, whether to the actor or another.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hersch“Fundamental in any proceeding finding criminal liability is the idea that one accused of a crime must have possessed a guilty mind as well as performed the proscribed act. * * * While modern statutory law has, to a limited degree, modified the traditional rule requiring a specific intent for every proscribed act * * *, it remains an essential element of the crime of theft * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Martin v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.