Rapp v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently June 1992
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Carter v. State · Townley v. State · Cody v. State · 97 Okla. Crim. 320 - Berg v. State · 46 Okla. Crim. 242 - Rich v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““This question was not presented in the motion for new trial, and we have repeatedly held that we will only consider those questions on appeal which are incorporated in the motion for new trial, and thereby submitted to the trial court for its ruling thereon, excepted to, and afterwards assigned for error, unless the question is jurisdictional. . . . ” (Citations omitted)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Boling v. State““It is our opinion that defendant waived all objections to such amendments when he entered his plea and proceeded to trial without timely offering those objections.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Starr v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.