Davis v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 1998
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 67 Okla. Crim. 16 - Kizer v. State · United States v. Gruber · 94 Okla. Crim. 61 - Leeth v. State · 60 Okla. Crim. 99 - Neely v. State · In Re the Habeas Corpus of Lutker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Repeated asking of incompetent questions which clearly have for their purpose intimation of something to jury thát is either not true or not capable of being proved if true, is wrong, and such conduct of counsel is not cured because court sustains objections to the question.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Smith v. State““It is improper for the county attorney to state his personal opinion as to the defendant’s guilt or to state facts not proven by evidence or otherwise given before the jury, that which amounts to his own opinion.” 413 P.2d, at 922 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Thompson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.