State v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1501 (Corporate and Criminal Fraud Accountability Act of 2002)
Relies on Bumper v. North Carolina · 133 S. Ct. 1552 - Missouri v. McNeely · 195 L. Ed. 2d 560 - Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert Bernard · Missouri v. McNeely · State v. Paahana
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. Any person who operates a vehicle upon a public way, street, road or highway or on or in the waters of the State shall be deemed to have given consent to a test or tests for the purpose of determining alcohol concentration or drug content of the person's breath, blood, or urine as applicable. 2. You may refuse to submit to a breath or blood test, or both, for the purpose of determining alcohol concentration and/or blood or urine test, or both, for the purpose of determining drug content.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Wilson“(a) A person commits the offense of operating a vehicle under the influence of an intoxicant if the person operates or assumes actual physical control of a vehicle: (1) While under the influence of alcohol in an amount sufficient to impair the person's normal mental faculties or ability to care for the person and guard against casualty[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Wilson“giv[ing] the defendant veto power over every stipulation agreed to by his or her counsel[ ] would burden the trial process and interfere with the role of defense counsel to exercise appropriate judgment in trial tactics and procedure.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Wilson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.