State v. Parvin’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “There are three elements to the foundation for the admission of a hearsay statement as a present sense impression: (1) the statement must describe or explain an event or condition; (2) the statement must be contemporaneous with the event; and (3) the declarant must have personally perceived the event.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Washington

2. “[o]ur courts have not delineated a time frame that would constitute 'immediately thereafter'; however, this court has held a statement given nearly ten hours after the perceived incident cannot be admitted under Rule 803(1).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Washington

3. “[a] statement describing or explaining an event or condition made while the declarant was perceiving the event or condition, or immediately thereafter.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Washington