413 So. 2d 1283 - Kindell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently September 2014
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jenkins v. Anderson · Anderson v. Charles · Graves v. United States · Raffel v. United States · Brown v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]n inference adverse to the defendant is permitted when the defendant fails to call witnesses only when it is shown that the witnesses are peculiarly within the defendant's power to produce and the testimony of the witnesses would elucidate the transaction, that is, that the witnesses are both available and competent.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“totally failed to establish the competency and availability of the ... [father as an] alibi witness as a predicate to its argument, but even more egregiously itself created, in order to later destroy, the alibi defense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Bayshore v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.