¶1It affirmatively appears that any violation of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.150(b) in the joinder in the same trial of the second degree murder count against the appellant Quevedo, and a charge of attempted murder of the same victim, occurring during the same barroom brawl, against Quevedo’s brother, was entirely harmless. The judgment under review is therefore affirmed. Sec. 924.33, Fla.Stat. (1979); see, Zeigler v. State, 402 So.2d 365 (Fla.1981); Harris v. State, 414 So.2d 557 (Fla. 3rd DCA (1982); Damon v. State, 397 So.2d 1224 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1981); compare Wilson v. State, 298 So.2d 433 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974), cert. dismissed, 327 So.2d 35 (Fla.1976); Paul v. State, 385 So.2d 1371 (Fla.1980).
413 So. 2d 136
Quevedo v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 27, 1982
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1982-04-27
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently September 1988
2 state decisions
Key passage — most relied on by later courts
“It affirmatively appears that any violation of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.150(b) in the join-der in the same trial of the second degree murder count against the appellant Quev-edo, and a charge of attempted murder of the same victim, occurring during the same barroom brawl, against Quevedo’s brother, was entirely harmless. The judgment under review is therefore affirmed. Sec. 924.33, Fla.Stat. (1979); see, Zeigler v. State, 402 So.2d 365 (Fla.1981); Harris v. State, 414 So.2d 557 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1982); Damon v. State, 397 So.2d 1224 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1981); compare Wilson v. State, 298 So.2d 433 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974), cert. dismissed, 327 So.2d 35 (Fla. 1976); Paul v. State, 385 So.2d 1371 (Fla. 1980).”
quoted by 1 later decision, including 436 So. 2d 87 - Quevedo v. State
Relies on 402 So. 2d 365 - Zeigler v. State · Florida Bar v. Pincus · Robles Del Mar, Inc. v. Town of Indian River Shores
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1982-04-27
View the full empirical analysis of this case →