Jones v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “The rights and remedies herein granted to an employee or his dependent on account of an injury or compensable sickness or disease for which he is entitled to compensation under this Chapter, shall be exclusive of all other rights and remedies of such employee, his personal representatives, dependents, or relations, against his employer, or any principal or any officer, director, stockholder, partner or employee of such employer or principal, for said injury or compensable sickness or disease. The purposes of this Section, the word”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 413 So. 2d 995 - Jacobsen v. Southeast Distributors, Inc.

2. “La.R.S. 23:1032 as amended by Act 147 of 1976. In Bazley v. Tortorich, 397 So.2d 475 (La. 1981), the Louisiana Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of La.R.S. 23:1032, as amended, as it precludes suits by employees seeking to recover from third persons for work-related injuries. In that decision, the Supreme Court held:”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 413 So. 2d 995 - Jacobsen v. Southeast Distributors, Inc.

3. “"[W]e construe the legislation under review as providing that the exclusive remedy rule shall be inapplicable to intentional torts or offenses."”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 413 So. 2d 995 - Jacobsen v. Southeast Distributors, Inc.