Heinberg v. Poole’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"`It is well settled that the legislative intent in enacting this statute was to extend personal jurisdiction of Louisiana Courts over non-residents to the full limits of due process, i.e., to any non-resident who has "minimum contacts" with this state. Drilling Engineering, Inc. v. Independent Indonesian American Pet. Co., 283 So.2d 687 (La.1973), and Aucoin v. Hanson, 207 So.2d 834 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1968) . This jurisprudence requires a liberal interpretation of LSA-R.S. 13:3201 in favor of finding jurisdiction. Adcock v. Surety Research & Inv. Corp., 344 So.2d 969 (La.1977) ; Latham v. Ryan, 373 So.2d 242 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1979) . "`The findings of jurisdiction over non-residents involves an evaluation of the factual circumstances of the case in light of federal constitutional principles. In order for the proper exercise of jurisdiction in personam over a non-resident there must be sufficient minimum contacts between the non-resident defendant and the forum state to satisfy due process and "traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice" as required by Shaffer v. Heitner, 433 U.S. 186 , 97 S.Ct. 2569 , 53 L.Ed.2d 683 (1977) ; International Shoe Company v. State of Washington, 326 U.S. 310 , 66 S.Ct. 154 , 90 L.Ed. 95 (1945) ; and McGee v. International Life Insurance Company, 355 U.S. 220 , 78 S.Ct. 199 , 2 L.Ed.2d 223 (1957) . Whether or not a particular defendant has sufficient minimum contacts with a state is to be determined from the facts and circumstances p”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 418 So. 2d 698 - Buckbee on Behalf of Buckbee v. Aweco, Inc.

2. “"The allegations of the petition clearly reflect that the $4,000.00 loan transaction took place in Alexandria, Rapides Parish, Louisiana. When the defendant effectuated this $4,000.00 loan transaction, such activity amounted to a `transaction of business' in that parish according to the provisions of LSA-R.S. 13:3201(a). Under these circumstances the trial court had jurisdiction over the defendant in this cause of action...."”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 426 So. 2d 727 - La. Bd. of Trus., McNeese St. Univ. v. Bruno

3. “"A court may exercise personal jurisdiction over a nonresident, who acts directly or by an agent, as to a cause of action arising from the nonresident's (a) transacting any business in this state;"”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 426 So. 2d 727 - La. Bd. of Trus., McNeese St. Univ. v. Bruno