¶1Upon our review of the complete record of appellant’s conviction for breaking and entering, we find insufficient admissible evidence of a breaking and that the highest offense sustained by the record on that charge is that of entering without breaking with intent to commit a felony. No error affects appellant’s other convictions. The breaking and entering judgment is therefore REVERSED and the case is REMANDED for entry of an appropriate judgment and for resentencing.
413 So. 2d 33
Fasenmyer v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 29, 1981
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1981-09-29
Key passage — most relied on by later courts
“No error affects appellant's other convictions.”
quoted by 1 later decision, including 457 So. 2d 1361 - Fasenmyer v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1981-09-29
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently August 2016
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →