Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 413 SO2D 396 - Collier v. State

Collier v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
September 1992
most recently cited

36 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Rakas v. Illinois · Jones v. United States · Rawlings v. Kentucky · United States v. Salvucci · Steagald v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the ruling of the trial court is correct for any reason, it will not be reversed.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"Persons charged with crimes of possession may only claim the benefits of the exclusionary rule if their own Fourth Amendment rights have in fact been *Page 190 violated. Salvucci , supra; Rakas , supra. The burden rests on the defendant to prove not only that a search was illegal, but also that he had a legitimate expectation of privacy in the area searched. Rawlings , supra. `"(A) prosecutor may, with legal consistency and legitimacy, assert that a defendant charged with possession of a seized item did not have a privacy interest violated in the course of the search and seizure.'" Salvucci , 100 S.Ct. at 2551 ."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The Salvucci test for standing is whether the defendant had a legitimate expectation of privacy from governmental invasion in the area searched....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.