Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 413 SW2D 141 - Crouch v. State

Crouch v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
June 1980
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 1980

9 state decisions

50196719701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on City of Austin v. Cannizzo · State v. Oakley · Morgan v. State · State v. Childress · State v. Curtis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A complete review of the Texas decisions as to the question of comparability has led us to conclude these three simple rules: (1) It is sufficient [if] it can be shown as a predicate that the lands involved in prior sales are similar to those taken. (2) The trial court has great discretion in determining whether sales offered in evidence are comparable to the land being taken. (3) A trial court’s decision that a prior sale is sufficiently similar to be considered comparable cannot be reviewed except to determine whether there has been an abuse of discretion.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.