McClellan v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
May 1986
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To affirm this conviction we would be required to find, contrary to the trial court’s ruling, that appellant was not deprived of a constitutional right and it was not fundamental error to require him to appear before the grand jury that found the indictment against him.... We conclude, without passing upon the trial court’s ruling, that the proper disposition of this appeal is to reverse the conviction and remand the cause.... (emphasis added)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Albarqawi v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.