Hanson v. Pelham’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 1968
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Duhig v. Peavy-Moore Lumber Co. · Miles v. Martin · Benge v. Scharbauer · McMahon v. Christmann · Radke v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is especially understood and agreed that the said H. Bockman retains all of the Oil, Gas and Mineral rights on the Northeast Quarter (NE/4) of Survey 37, Block 36, Township 5 North, T & P Ry. Co. Surveys in Dawson County, Texas, and at any time he shall desire to develop any of the minerals above mentioned or retained herein, he can proceed with such development at his will by paying to the then owner of the land the actual damages caused by such development, if there should be cause for such damage, otherwise, he shall proceed at his will to the development of said minerals.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Forrest v. Hanson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.