Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

413 S.W.3d 689

Coutts v. Walker

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 12, 2013

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2013-11-12

Decided 2013-11-12

¶1ORDER

' PER CURIAM:

¶2Appellants Ricky and Frances Coutts filed a legal malpractice action against attorney James D. Walker, Jr. in the Circuit Court of Jackson County. The Couttses alleged that Walker negligently failed to appeal an adverse judgment entered against them in an earlier ease in which he represented them. The circuit court granted Walker’s motion for summary judgment, finding that the Couttses could not prove that they would have been successful in any appeal of the underlying case, and therefore could not prove that they had been damaged by Walker’s actions. The Couttses appeal. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to ■ the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

/413/sw3d/689 · .json · Public domain