DeGirolamo v. Applegate (In Re Applegate)’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 541 · 11 U.S.C. § 542 · 11 U.S.C. § 547 · 11 U.S.C. § 548 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 1409 · 28 U.S.C. § 1447 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on Acolyte Electric Corp. v. City of New York · White v. White · Lowenbraun v. Canary · Novak v. Lorenz (In Re Novak) · Delphi Automotive Systems, LLC v. Segway Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a multi-factor balancing test, not a rule in which every element must be satisfied....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.