Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 414 F.2d 1060 - No 27211

No 27211’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
January 1998
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently January 1998

3 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

801969197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. O'Brien · Home Building & Loan Ass'n v. Blaisdell · Selective Draft Law Cases · Arver v. United States · Winters v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In 1933 Congress adopted the dual enlistment concept whereby an incoming guardsman joined both the National Guard of his home state and the National Guard of the United States, a reserve component of the U.S. Army. The express purpose of the dual enlistment concept was to avoid the limitations of the militia clause and to organize the National Guard under the broader power to raise and support armies. (Johnson v. Powell, 414 F.2d 1060, 1063 (5th Cir. 1969)). (emphasis supplied).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.