Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

414 F.2d 352

Docket No. 17583.

Jackson v. United States

Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted on Briefs May 9, 1969.

Decided May 23, 1969.

Third Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1969-05-23

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1969

1 federal appellate ·

3 counsel of record

Relies on 302 F. Supp. 216 - Jackson v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1969-05-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey; Reynier J. Wortendyke, Jr., Judge.

¶2Frank Jackson, pro se.

¶3Jerome D. Schwitzer, Asst. U. S. Atty., David M. Satz, Jr., Newark, N. J., for appellee.

¶4Before McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER and VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judges.

¶5OPINION OF THE COURT

¶6PER CURIAM.

¶7The District Court denied the defendant Jackson’s petition for vacation of sentence which was premised on his contention that he was deprived of his right to counsel at all phases of the criminal proceedings against him and that as a result he made an involuntary confession and entered a guilty plea to an indictment charging him with theft of a money order while in the employ of the Internal Revenue Service.

¶8On review of the record we find no error.

¶9The Order of the District Court denying Jackson’s petition will be affirmed for the reasons so well stated in Judge Wortendyke’s Opinion, 302 F.Supp. 216.

/414/f2d/352 · .json · Public domain