Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 414 F.2d 428 - Minerals & Chemicals Philipp Corp. v. Milwhite Co.

Minerals & Chemicals Philipp Corp. v. Milwhite Co.’s Empirical Analysis

414 F.2d 428 · 1969

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
April 1991
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently April 1991 · most notably Dooley v. Weil (1982), National Companies Health Benefit Plan v. St. Joseph's Hospital of Atlanta, Inc. (1991)

11 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

1401969197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Movible Offshore Co. v. Ousley · Jacobs v. Perry · 150 So. 2d 477 - Richards v. Dodge · 128 So. 2d 420 - Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. Simpson · Bostic v. Whited

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The essentials of equitable estoppel are: (1) words and admissions, or conduct, acts and acquiescence, or all combined causing another person to believe in the existence of a certain state of things; (2) in which the person so speaking, admitting, acting and acquiescing did so wilfully, culpably, or negligently, and (3) by which such other person is or may be induced to act so as to change his own previous position injuriously. The parties sought to be estopped must be guilty of conduct which amounts to concealment of material facts at a time when he has knowledge, actual or constructive of the real facts. * * Aetna Casualty and Surety Co. v. Simpson, 128 So.2d 420 [425] (D.C.A.Fla.1961).””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “once a remittitur has been accepted it may not later be appealed unless the acceptance was made under protest.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.