Esquivel v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
414 F.2d 607 · 1969
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 1991
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Escoe v. Zerbst · United States v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. · Ray Earnest v. J. T. Willingham, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas · Weathers v. Willingham · Robinson v. Willingham
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.