Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 414 F.2d 739 - Bowen v. Cullman Bros.

Bowen v. Cullman Bros.’s Empirical Analysis

414 F.2d 739 · 1969

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 1985
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jacksonville Terminal Co. v. Railway Express Agency, Inc. · Fidelity v. Lott · McGhee Interests, Inc. v. Alexander National Bank · Fidelity-Phenix Fire Insurance v. Farm Air Service, Inc. · Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America v. Du Pont

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is not apparent from the language of the contract what items of expenditure by [defendant] go to make up ‘the cost of packing and warehousing’ the crop. This language then, of course, is ambiguous, and parol evidence must be received to determine what goes into such cost of packing and warehousing.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.