Berven v. Gardner’s Empirical Analysis
414 F.2d 857 · 1969
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently February 1998 · most notably Stark v. Weinberger (1974), Basinger v. Heckler (1984)
11 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miracle v. Celebrezze · Celebrezze v. Warren · Jarvis v. Ribicoff · Combs v. Gardner · Ross v. Gardner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[1] Where all of the medical testimony or expert opinions support or tend to support the claim of the appellant that she was disabled within the meaning of the statute in and prior to [the expiration of insured status] and no medical or other testimony appears to the contrary, then we believe that a finding by the Secretary to the effect that disability was not established is not supported by substantial evidence and must be set aside.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hamm v. Harris · Hahn v. Apfel
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.