Board of Regents the University of Texas System University of Texas at Austin v. Nippon Telephone and Telegraph Corporation’s Empirical Analysis
414 F.3d 1358 · 2005
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently April 2020
7 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp. · Pegram v. Herdrich · Pullman Co. v. Jenkins · Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] court must review and analyze the plaintiffs pleadings, with special attention directed to the relief requested by the plaintiff, in making the determination as to whether a cause of action arises under the patent laws. . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.