Michael v. Horn’s Empirical Analysis
414 F.3d 464 · 2005
Citation profile
29
cited by 29 later decisions
September 2017
most recently cited
28 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Faretta v. California · Jones v. Barnes · Whitmore v. Arkansas · Gonzalez v. Crosby · Acosta-Esquivel v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the answer is yes, we shall abide by that answer and dismiss the appeal. Notes: * (Amended—See Clerk's Order dated 1/6/05) 1 42 Pa. Cons.Stat. Ann. §§ 9541-9546 2 Michael indicated in the District Court that he had filed the new affidavit”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Michael v. Horn“to speed the processing of his case because[,] `regardless if [he] did that or not [, the attorneys representing him] were still going to try to push that through.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Michael v. Horn“Cosgrove and Michael are working at cross-purposes as it is clear that Cosgrove does not want us to dismiss Michael's appeal but Michael does.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Michael v. Horn
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.