Dreamscape Design, Inc. v. Affinity Network, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
414 F.3d 665 · 2005
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 47 U.S.C. § 160 · 47 U.S.C. § 201 · 47 U.S.C. § 202 · 47 U.S.C. § 203 · 47 U.S.C. § 207 · 47 U.S.C. § 332 · 47 U.S.C. § 542
Relies on Simon Taylor v. Joe Anderson · American Telephone and Telegraph Company, v. Central Office Telephone, Inc. · Ting v. AT&T · Kaplan v. ITT-U.S. Transmission Systems, Inc. · Boomer v. AT & T Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“For the reasons we discussed at length in Boomer , we do not see how Congress's clearly expressed intent regarding uniformity and reasonableness of rates, as demonstrated in Sections 201 and 202 of the FCA, can be squared with Ting's apparent conclusion that state contract law can invalidate the terms or conditions of long-distance contracts after detariffing.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Notwithstanding section 332(c)(1)(A) of this title, the Commission shall forbear from applying any regulation or any provision of this chapter to a telecommunications carrier or telecommunications service, or class of telecommunications carriers or telecommunications services, in any or some of its or their geographic markets, if the Commission determines that— (1)enforcement of such regulation or provision is not necessary to ensure that the charges, practices, classifications, or regulations by, for, or in connection with that telecommunications carrier or telecommunications service are just and reasonable and are not unjustly or unreasonably discriminatory; (2) enforcement of such regulation or provision is not necessary for the protection of consumers; and (3) forbearance from applying such provision or regulation is consistent with the public interest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.