Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 414 FSUPP 371 - Briggs v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., Inc.

Briggs v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
September 2006
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently September 2006

5 federal appellate · 4 district ·

1301976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Griggs v. Duke Power Co. · Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody · Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin · Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc. · Wetzel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) Prerequisites to a Class Action. One or more members of a class may sue or be sued as representative parties on behalf of all only if (1) the class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable, (2) there are questions of law or fact common to the class, (3) the claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical of the claims or defenses of the class, and (4) the representative parties will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “validity of and proper inferences to be drawn from any such statistics, of course, is a matter to be litigated at trial,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.