Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 414 FSUPP 975 - Coomes v. Adkinson

Coomes v. Adkinson’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
February 2016
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently February 2016

6 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions

6019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 25 U.S.C. § 2 · 25 U.S.C. § 393 · 25 U.S.C. § 450 (§ 2 of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act of 1975) · 25 U.S.C. § 450A (§ 3 of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act of 1975) · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1361 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 5 U.S.C. § 701

Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Mathews v. Eldridge · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person suffering legal wrong because of agency action is entitled to judicial review thereof. An action in a Court of the United States seeking relief other than money damages and stating a claim that an agency or an officer or employee thereof acted or failed to act in an official capacity or under color of legal authority shall not be dismissed nor relief therein be denied on the ground that it is against the United States or that the United States is an indispensable party.... Nothing herein (1) affects other limitations on judicial review or the power or duty of the court to dismiss any action or deny relief on any other appropriate legal or equitable ground; or (2) confers authority to grant relief if any other statute that grants consent to suit expressly or impliedly forbids the relief which is sought.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “are not seeking money damages from the government, nor are they seeking to assert some right against it or to block a government project. The relief they seek does not in any way affect the sovereign power of the United States. The government is not asked to give up a right, to grant a concession, to dispose of property or relinquish authority.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[T]he Court has fully and finally rejected the wooden distinction between 'rights' and 'privileges' that once seemed to govern the applicability of procedural due process rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.