Vanderwerf v. SmithKlineBeecham Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 301 (Animal Drug Amendments of 1968)
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Scheuer v. Rhodes · Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. Thompson · Hall v. Bellmon · Huebner v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a violation of the FDCA cannot give rise to a negligence per se claim”); Blinn v. Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc., 55 F.Supp.2d 1353, 1361 (M.D.Fla.1999) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.