414 F. Supp. 2d 814 - Wuliger v. Eberle’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77 · 15 U.S.C. § 78C (§ 3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 80B
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Securities & Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co. · United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. Forman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“requirement. Lopez-Carrasquillo v. Rubianes, 230 F.3d 409, 414 (1st Cir.2000) (affidavit stating”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.