Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 414 Md. 708 - YEARBY v. State

YEARBY v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
August 2023
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · Chapman v. State of California · United States v. Bagley · United States v. Agurs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““There are three components of a true Brady violation: The evidence at issue must be favorable to the accused, either because it is exculpatory, or because it is impeaching; that evidence must have been suppressed by the State, either willfully or inadvertently; and prejudice must have ensued.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “(a) Disclosure without request. Without the necessity of a request, the State’s Attorney shall furnish to the defendant: (1) Any material or information tending to negate or mitigate the guilt or punishment of the defendant as to the offense charged; (2) Any relevant material or information regarding: (A) specific searches and seizures, wire taps or eavesdropping, (B) the acquisition of statements made by the defendant to a State agent that the State intends to use at a hearing or trial, and (C) pretrial identification of the defendant by a witness for the State.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “Without the necessity of a request, the State’s Attorney shall provide to the defense: (6) Impeachment Information. All material or information in any form, whether or not admissible, that tends to impeach a State’s witness, including: (B) a relationship between the State’s Attorney and the witness, including the nature and circumstances of any agreement, understanding, or representation that may constitute an inducement for the cooperation or testimony of the witness[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.