Underwood v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 1986
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Lagenour v. State · Crosson v. State · Lyda v. State · 136 Ind. App. 269 - Beaty v. Donaldson · INDIANA STATE BOARD OF TAX COM'RS v. Pappas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'The motion serves merely to prevent the display of potentially prejudicial matter to the jury until the trial court has had the opportunity to rule on the admissibility of the evidence within the context of the trial itself. (citations omitted.) Thus, the error, if it is created at all, is based not on the motion in limine but on the admissibility of the testimony accord-img to the rules of evidence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Trevino v. State · Hadley v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.