Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 414 N.J. Super. 194 - State v. Schmidt

414 N.J. Super. 194 - State v. Schmidt’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2011
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Stupakoff v. Otto (GmbH & Co. KG) · State v. Chun · State v. Widmaier · 348 N.J. Super. 609 - State v. Duffy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “I have previously informed you that the warnings given to you concerning your right to remain silent and your right to consult with an attorney do not apply to the taking of breath samples and do not give you a right to refuse to give, or delay giving, samples of your breath for the purpose of making chemical tests to determine the content of alcohol in your blood. If you (1) do not respond to my question about submitting breath samples; or (2) tell me that you refuse to answer this question because you have a right to remain silent or first wish to consult with an attorney, physician or any other person; or (3) tell me that you will not submit breath samples because you have a right to remain silent or first wish to consult with an attorney, physician, or any other person, then you will be issued a separate summons charging you with refusing to submit to the taking of samples of your breath for the purpose of making chemical tests to determine the content of alcohol in your blood. [ Id. at 200 , 997 A. 2d 1092 (quoting State v. Widmaier, 157 N.J. 475, 484-85 , 724 A. 2d 241 (1999)).]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.