Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 414 NW2D 433 - Kleeman v. Cadwell

Kleeman v. Cadwell’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
April 1992
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co. · Dimick v. Schiedt · Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Pfeifer · Chesapeake Ohio Railway Company v. Addie Kelly · Liotta v. National Forge Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Unless there is evidence to support submitting the issue of damages to the jury on a different basis, a verdict form which requires only a determination of the total future damages and the years over which they will be sustained is appropriate. * * * Thus unless it appears from the evidence that damages will be sustained unevenly, which makes a more detailed verdict form appropriate, damages may be assumed to be spread more or less evenly over the specified time period.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “The objective of the [Minnesota] method is to determine the ‘real’ yield of money: that portion of interest charged on virtually risk-free investments that repre sents only the real cost of money and not the additional cost the lender charges as a hedge against inflation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.