Application of Sharp’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 1975
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Sharp v. State · 2 Okla. Crim. 589 - Reed v. State · 20 Okla. Crim. 177 - Cardwell v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"... [W]e have repeatedly held that 22 O.S. 1961 , § 660 requires a juror's removal for cause if he has conscientious opinions concerning capital punishment that would preclude his finding the defendant guilty. See Cardwell v. State, 20 Okl.Cr. 177 , 201 P. 817 and Reed v. State, 2 Okl.Cr. 589 , 103 P. 1042 ."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Justus v. State · Koonce v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.