Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 414 P3D 1 - People v. Pernell

People v. Pernell’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Braxton · United States v. Magallanez · United States v. Arroyo-Angulo · Government of the Virgin Islands v. Knight · United States v. Beckman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the event was sufficiently startling to render normal reflective thought processes of the observer inoperative; (2) the statement was a spontaneous reaction to the event; and (3) direct or circumstantial evidence exists to allow the jury to infer that the declarant had the opportunity to observe the startling event.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “I know, I know. That's the reason I got rid of [the gun] and I, I promise you that my word that that is done.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “'several independent interludes of reflective thought' that rendered her statements less than spontaneous.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.