Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 414 P3D 559 - State v. Jamieson

State v. Jamieson’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
January 2020
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Cuyler v. Sullivan · State v. Dunn · State v. Clark · State v. Bond

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]n the case of restitution, a reviewing court will not disturb a district court's determination unless the court exceeds the authority prescribed by law or abuses its discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “To the extent that the district court made legal determinations in connection with its restitution analysis, we review those legal determinations for correctness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “For an error to be obvious ... the law governing the error [must be] clear or plainly settled at the time the alleged error was made.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.