Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

414 So. 2d 1087

Oliver v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1982-05-05

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently September 2009

16 state decisions

Relies on 400 So. 2d 1015 - Sanders v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1982-05-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm appellant’s conviction and his maximum sentence for attempted first degree murder. However, the sentencing order and transcript of the sentencing hearing are silent on the court’s particular justification for retention over the first third of the sentence.

¶2Accordingly, we REMAND to the court with instructions to either relinquish jurisdiction over the first third of the sentence or state with individual particularity the justification for retaining jurisdiction. See Sanders v. State, 400 So.2d 1015, 1016 (Fla.2d DCA 1981); § 947.16(3), Fla.Stat. (1981).

SCHEB, C. J., and OTT and SCHOON-OVER, JJ., concur.
/414/so2d/1087 · .json · Public domain