414 So. 2d 1229 - State v. Feeback’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
61 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently July 2012 · most notably 430 So. 2d 124 - State v. Tully (1983), State v. Brooks (1983)
61 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Aguilar v. Texas · 277 So. 2d 126 - State v. Prieur · 372 So. 2d 1024 - State v. Hatcher · 315 So. 2d 675 - State v. Carlisle · State v. Findley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"In the instant case, the items in question clearly tend to prove the commission of the charged offenses ... tend to show defendant's intent to distribute and/or his dominion and control over the drugs seized from his residence. They are also consistent with the type of things possessed by a drug dealer."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““While in the course of executing a search warrant, a peace officer may ... seize things whether or not described in the warrant that may constitute evidence tending to prove the commission of any offense, and perform all other acts pursuant to his duties.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The state and the defendant shall have the right before argument to submit to the court special written charges for the jury. Such charges may be received by the court in its discretion after argument has begun. The party submitting the charges shall furnish a copy of the charges to the other party when the charges are submitted to the court. A requested special charge shall be given by the court if it does not require qualification, limitation, or explanation, and if it is wholly correct and pertinent. It need not be given if it is included in the general charge or in another special charge to be given.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.