414 So. 2d 349 - State v. Day’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
51 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably 851 So. 2d 921 - State v. Tate (2003), 838 So. 2d 729 - State v. Taylor (2003)
51 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Sepulvado · 384 So. 2d 355 - State v. Bonanno · 374 So. 2d 1195 - State v. Spencer · 405 So. 2d 829 - State v. Rogers · State v. Sims
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"A sentence must be individualized and this entails consideration of the underlying circumstances of the crime. La.C. Cr.P. Art. 875(A)(1); La.C.Cr.P. Art. 894.1(A)(3); State v. Sepulvado, 367 So.2d 762 (La.1979). * * * * * * The court could not ignore the underlying circumstances of the crime and still individualize the sentence. State v. Sepulvado, supra."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Williams · State v. Capps“[d]isparities are inherent in a system where punishment is tailored to fit the defendant and the crime.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“without independently considering the merits of each case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Cole
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.