Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

414 So. 2d 37

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1982-05-25

Relies on 383 So. 2d 219 - Eutsey v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1982-05-25

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently October 2008

6 state decisions

30198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The defendant was properly convicted of robbery with a firearm pursuant to Section 812.13, Florida Statutes (1979). Nonetheless, his enhanced sentence, as a habitual offender, must be reversed and remanded to afford the defendant a copy of the pre-sentence investigation prior to the imposition of sentence, as required by Section 775.084(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1979). Eutsey v. State, 383 So.2d 219 (Fla.1980). In all other respects, his adjudications and sentences are affirmed.

¶2Affirmed in part and reversed in part with directions.

/414/so2d/37 · .json · Public domain