414 So. 2d 509 - Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

cited by 43 later decisions

states following

November 2012

most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 42 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently November 2012 · most notably 29 So. 3d 1105 - Aills v. Boemi (2010), 462 So. 2d 1075 - Mills v. State (1985)

1 federal appellate · 42 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 365 So. 2d 701 - Castor v. State · 397 So. 2d 663 - State v. Williams · 94 So. 2d 829 - Mariani v. Schleman · Williams v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“specific enough `to apprise the trial judge of the putative error and to preserve the issue for intelligent review on appeal.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 894 So. 2d 282 - APR v. State · 428 So. 2d 369 - Brown v. State
“notice of a challenge against the retroactive application of the statute was clearly given”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 428 So. 2d 369 - Brown v. State · 898 So. 2d 266 - Baskin v. State
“... magic words are not needed to make a proper objection.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 460 So. 2d 915 - Walcott v. State · 898 So. 2d 266 - Baskin v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.